Reduce stretch film consumption without compromising the load

Many operations use more film out of habit: extra turns to compensate for variable loads, rolls that do not use prestretch well or buying by roll price instead of cost per pallet.

Waste can also come from breaks, cores, frequent roll changes or differences between operators.

Gauge alone is not enough. Compare meters applied, number of turns, packaging weight per pallet, incidents, application time and waste generated.

With machines, it is also important to check whether real prestretch matches the expected value and whether the roll runs without stops.

A thinner film can be a good option if it keeps the required containment. If it causes breaks, rework or rejected pallets, the saving disappears.

The improvement should be validated with usual loads, not only with an ideal trial.

Compare the finished pallet: grams applied, meters consumed, wrapping time, incidents and generated waste.

A lower roll price can be expensive if it contains fewer useful meters, breaks more or forces extra turns.

MicroForce can fit when lower thickness with good resistance is needed, provided the load allows that configuration.

Coreless makes sense when core waste, handling or storing empty cores is part of the operational problem.